M3B3: Leveraging Tools, Texts, and Talk in My Teaching Context
As a global history teacher, I often find myself using a variety of non-digitized sources to enhance the overall message and meaning of the lesson. However, with the massive increase in technology and social media, attempting to just use print-based media and literacies has become challenging. It is imperative that we, as educators, find a way to balance the usage of technology and print based media and literacies. In the article The Importance of Still Teaching the iGeneration: New Technologies and the Centrality of Pedagogy, Thomas Philip and Antero Garcia bring up incredible points about the misconceptions that come along with digital literacies and introducing technology into the classroom. Philip and Garcia state “The context, not the tool, is what is important when making decisions about utilizing new technology within learning environments. Simply making a mobile device available to students or using these devices to study issues important to them does not bridge relevancy between the students' multiple worlds.” (Philips and Garcia, 2013). This is a relevant point and highlights the importance of engaging with students beyond the use of technology. As educators, we must be able to create thoughtful and engaging lessons without relying on technology. Technology does not automatically give us the tools in order to connect to students' backgrounds and experiences, which is vital to ensure we are designing equitable learning for our students. Being able to navigate conversations around technology with students could be challenging, as most students have grown up with technology and see it as a vital part of their lives. I believe having open and honest discussions with the students and listening to their perspectives on technology use in the classroom is an effective way to navigate around technology reliance. I feel if my students and I can communicate, and I express to them the concerns with technology and why the balance between that and traditional mediums is important, I believe it can create a balanced classroom environment. The need for constant check-ins will also be necessary if technology is used in the classroom, ensuring students are on task and not distracted. Ultimately, it comes down to the goal and what we are trying to achieve from our students. Once that is settled, I believe we can assess what types of literacy strategies should be used for that lesson. In the article Nondigital Skills, by Antero Garcia, he states “Although digital tools can help document the world in newly nuanced ways and demonstrate new perspectives, digital literacies often primarily heighten the analog demands we have in our learning goals. In our classrooms, this means emphasizing what experiences you want students to engage with, regardless of the kinds of technologies used.” This highlights the idea that students' needs are first and having them attain the goal of the lesson is necessary. Assessing the tools we need to achieve the goal is secondary.
If educators go into the classroom with the mindset that technology can be a tool for use when relevant, but not the focal point of a lesson, we can create thoughtful and literate students. A way in which we can do this is through assignments that have them engage with technology, but do not solely rely on it. An example of this could be to have students examine the differing language/bias that exists within print-based media versus digital media. This could be done in a lesson about the development and evolution of propaganda, or the development of journalism, and utilizes online media as a tool, without having it be the focal point of the lesson. I believe that this helps students navigate the technology, without relying on it to get their answers. The assignment also allows students to think critically about what they are reading, and highlights to them that language usage between differing mediums is present. However, there are challenges involved with this assignment. Firstly, there may be equity concerns with students who do not have access to online mediums at home. This can create a challenge in the classroom and would require help and guidance during the assignment. Long with this, Philips and Garcia state, “Instruments initially intended for convenience can easily shift in usage to become data-gathering tools” (Philips and Garcia, 2023). To avoid the problems with students beginning to take advantage of their electronic devices in the classroom, the need for constant check-ins is essential. These check-ins should be done for two reasons; one, to ensure the students are on task and two, to ensure the students understand why and how they are to be using their electronics.
__________________________________________________________________________
Refrences
Garcia, A. (2017). NONDIGITAL SKILLS. Literacy Today, 35(3), 24-25.
https://sunyempire.idm.oclc.org/login?qurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.proquest.com%2Ftrade-j
ournals%2Fnondigital-skills%2Fdocview%2F1966005428%2Fse-2%3Faccountid%3D8067
Philip, T. M., & Garcia, A. D. (2013). The Importance of Still Teaching the iGeneration: New
Technologies and the Centrality of Pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 83(2),
300-319,400-401.
https://sunyempire.idm.oclc.org/login?qurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.proquest.com%2Fscholarl
y-journals%2Fimportance-still-teaching-igeneration-new%2Fdocview%2F1399327199%2Fse-2
%3Faccountid%3D8067
As a history teacher who has struggled with the balancing the use of print based media and literacies with the use of technology and digital tools, I definitely stand in community with you and your thoughts on these matters. I loved your line "Technology does not automatically give us the tools in order to connect to students' backgrounds and experiences" because it reminded me of teaching in Tanzania in 2017 where the teachers used to joke around with us and tell us that some of our reliance on technology, wifi, printers, etc. were our "first world problems". They would laugh at us because we were so dependent on things that we no longer had access to and felt we couldn't teach. We soon learned that the best way to teach the children there was to reach them by learning who they were, learning about them and their interests and then working with their teachers to identify strengths and weaknesses in the learning experience for the students as well as the teachers. One fact they pointed out was that they needed to begin introducing more technology and the use of digital tools but they had an appreciation for the fact they were not yet dependent on them to facilitate their instruction.
ReplyDeleteI also appreciated how you stated that it should be the mindset of a teacher to have technology as the "tool for use" and not the "focal point of a lesson" because it all is dependent on how we as teachers facilitate the balanced use of technology and print based media.
As a history teacher like you, I thought a good suggestion came from "More Than Bits or Bytes" by Earl Aguilera in "exploring issues like intellectual property, internet censorship, and government surveillance, we can help students ask more critical questions about the impact of digital media and technologies". (Aguilera, 207) I struggle to find the balance you are referencing because I struggle with ideas on what to do and how to do it. So, I thought this was a timely read considering all that is happening right now with our government and social media platforms, etc.
While I agree with you that there is a need for check-ins with regard to how students are using digital tools, I wonder how this may lead to punitive punishments and consequences for students who have not yet matured to use the tools as responsibly as they should. I do think there needs to be a unit designed to teach us and students the "WHY"and "HOW" of using digital tools that you closed your post with. I am just concerned that the "check-in" can become another way for an educator who doesn't understand the "WHY" themselves to be punitive in their oversight of these new literacies.
Thank you for the post. I am glad we are practicing these new literacies right now by blogging and commenting on each other's blogs. As stated in "Rethinking Language Learning" this "e-generation" is "strongly motivated by the integration of technology" and "blogging could enhance students' learning" and this is definitely motivating me to even use something like this blogging experience or audio blogging with students. (Hsu & Wang, 2017)
Hsu, H., & Wang, S. (2017). RETHINKING LANGUAGE LEARNING. Literacy Today, 35(3), 28-29. https://sunyempire.idm.oclc.org/login?qurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.proquest.com%2Ftrade-journals%2Frethinking-language-learning%2Fdocview%2F1966005990%2Fse-2%3Faccountid%3D8067
Aguilera, E. (2017). MORE THAN BITS AND BYTES. Literacy Today, 35(3), 12-13. https://sunyempire.idm.oclc.org/login?qurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.proquest.com%2Ftrade-journals%2Fmore-than-bits-bytes%2Fdocview%2F1966006470%2Fse-2%3Faccountid%3D8067